Thinking Makes It So
"'Tis an ill cook that cannot lick his own fingers."
-Second Servingman, Romeo and Juliet
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Self-Evaluation: Looking Back and Having All the Good Ideas Now
Goodness, but this is almost always the worst part of any assignment! I see everything I could have done better, and everything that I would do if I had more time. But off we go to what I think of my own work and research.
Hub Post Finale: SOUND IN SHAKESPEARE
This has been an adventurous foray into the world of SOUND IN SHAKESPEARE, looking at how SOUND FOCUSES THE TEXT. I've posted a series of individual ideas that I would now like to link together those posts into a conclusion about what I've learned from these studies.
Sound makes all the difference in the understanding of a Shakespearean play. It is what focuses the meaning of the text, and alters the experience of the audience. What influences the sound also influences the focus and theme of the delivered text. The actor is what directly focuses the words from the page to the words ringing in the ears of all those who are experiencing the wonder of a Shakespearean play.
ANNNNNNNNND... I'm ENGAGED!
So I got ENGAGED tonight. It was a little distracting (BIIIIIIG understatement!) from some of my homework, but with our schedules, this was the only night that worked! Andrew is pretty much just the best man alive, and I'm the happiest woman because of it. :) So Professor Burton, what was that offer you extended for following the brethren? Something about an A? Haha. :)
Posted by
Natashya
at
9:51 PM
ANNNNNNNNND... I'm ENGAGED!
2011-04-12T21:51:00-07:00
Natashya
HAPPY ENGAGEMENT|
Comments
Labels:
HAPPY ENGAGEMENT
What's That Sound?: The Difference of Actors
Continuing along with this theme of SOUND FOCUSING TEXT, I would like to delve into something that really interests me. The difference of actors. The way that each individual interprets texts adds so much (or, in some cases, takes away) from just the words. I would like to show you a few interesting clips that I've found that compare over 10 different versions of the SAME SCENE in Hamlet, and each one is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT! Isn't that amazing?! Last time, we looked at how the setting of the scene can impact the sound, and therefore, the focus of the text. This time we're focusing on just the actors' interpretations themselves.
This is part 1 of 4 of a series that takes Act 1, Scene 2 from Hamlet and gives it to us again and again and again, from different film productions. We'll be focusing on Laurence Olivier, Mel Gibson, Ethan Hawke, and David Tennant. Let's look at some key aspects of the Hamlets in these productions:
This is part 1 of 4 of a series that takes Act 1, Scene 2 from Hamlet and gives it to us again and again and again, from different film productions. We'll be focusing on Laurence Olivier, Mel Gibson, Ethan Hawke, and David Tennant. Let's look at some key aspects of the Hamlets in these productions:
Monday, April 11, 2011
How do performance aspects influence how the sounds focus the text?
Continuing in my vein of SOUND FOCUSING TEXT, I will be spending some time with looking at how different performance aspects influence how sound really channels the text. I talked about this topic previously in my post on The Winter's Tale, with how setting influenced the actual meaning of the words being spoken.
Let's take a look at three different performances of Hamlet Act 1, Scene 2, each one with a different take on setting. It's interesting the way that the background details can change the very nuance of the sounds.
Let's take a look at three different performances of Hamlet Act 1, Scene 2, each one with a different take on setting. It's interesting the way that the background details can change the very nuance of the sounds.
Posted by
Natashya
at
10:08 AM
How do performance aspects influence how the sounds focus the text?
2011-04-11T10:08:00-07:00
Natashya
Hamlet|reserach|set and sound|Sound|Sound and Text|
Comments
Labels:
Hamlet,
reserach,
set and sound,
Sound,
Sound and Text
Taming of the Shrew: A Literary Analysis Using a Feminist Criticism
Image from here |
Mary Wollstonecraft was in the First Wave of feminism that started way back in the Romantic Era. She wasn't a radical, burn-your-bra kind of woman. She was a woman that wanted equality with men in relationships. I will be using her brand of criticism from her essay A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.
Society has set forth a constructed set of rules that dictates this is masculine, that is feminine, and then people act according to those dictates. In the world of The Taming of the Shrew (Taming), a good woman was to be meek, quiet, soft, and beautiful. They were not to be opinionated, strong-willed, or vocal. That was the man's realm. Bianca pretends to be the perfect woman, and in doing so, gains the admiration of society. Kate does not conform to the feminine, and is othered, and labeled as a Shrew.
Posted by
Natashya
at
8:47 AM
Taming of the Shrew: A Literary Analysis Using a Feminist Criticism
2011-04-11T08:47:00-07:00
Natashya
literary analysis|LO#1|LO#2|Taming of the Shrew|
Comments
Labels:
literary analysis,
LO#1,
LO#2,
Taming of the Shrew
Finishing the Reading that I started
Courtesy of Karen Whimsey |
I have been catching up on my reading this past weekend, finishing plays that I didn't have time to complete earlier in the semester. Can I just say that the History Plays are duller than a dead cat licking peanut butter off of a moldy pickle? Ya, they're just not very exciting. What was exciting, however, was finishing The Taming of the Shrew. That's a good play. It's the one that I've been the most drawn to all semester. I've watched several film versions/adaptations of this movie, some of which I blogged about in previous posts. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)