Pages

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

The State of Two Unions

In reading Henry V, I found myself inundated in politics today. As I was watching the State of the Union Address by President Obama, I made several connections to some lines in the play. Here's a brief rundown of the points that came down to mind.

  • President Obama stated that there needed to be bipartisan efforts in order for the government to accomplish anything of value. In 1.2, Exeter states that "For government, though, and low, and lower, put into parts, doth keep in one consent, like congreeing in a full and natural close, like music" (180-183).  I don't know about what others think, but I'm thinking that modern politics hardly sound like music. The intense discords between mudslinging hooligans is not of the same caliber as the intense discords that ease off into some kind of resolution. If there is no working together, then the parties just take turns passing bills when their party is the majority, and it changes with the elections. It becomes very difficult for real progress to be made.
  • King Henry V declared that England needed to be prepared not only to invade France, but also to defend itself from invasions from the Scots. Obama said we need to look at our infrastructure which has fallen over the past several years, and find a way to build it back up again. 
    • He talked about several key issues that would help build us back up in the world again, including increased availability of high-speed internet access, good resources, high-speed trains, and improving the road systems. We need to have a good strong base in order to be able to do anything to help other countries. 
    • Part of that strong base is our children's education. If the kids aren't taught well, then the future of the country is also in danger. We shouldn't educate other people, and then send them off to other countries to compete against us and our businesses. We should use the education system to build up the nation. President Obama called for good teachers to rise up and serve their country. It's interesting that the call has gone from soldiers to teachers.
Well, those are some of the ideas that were floating down in my head. They aren't spectacularly well developed right now, but I plan on looking further into the ideas of education and politics in relation to Shakespearean plays. I also plan on writing what I had researched before I watched the Address and wrote this instead.

Have a glorious day! 

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Very interesting! Thanks for this. I, too, was pondering Shakespeare's history plays during the State of the Union address, trying to see if I noticed any connections. I didn't do as well as you did, but maybe tomorrow as I get a transcript of the speech and can study it a bit more.

Anyway, thanks for this, it was an interesting read.
Excellent connections! I'll have to try this myself.
I was planning on going to look at cravats instead of listening to the State of the Union (since I find politics blasé), but I ended up watching the whole thing. A few things struck me. First and foremost, Obama has gotten SO good at speaking. I mean, better than before. And that's impressive. Second, he's being pretty assertive about America's role in the world, which is a first. Usually he's trying to convince Americans to settle. I enjoyed that. However, as an enthusiast of the cosmos, and someone who championed NASA's recently truncated Constellation program (thank you, Obama), I was pretty annoyed that he kept touting math and science as our future. I find all politicians equally despicable, and it's only when they're in the history books that I find them interesting (Napoleon rules). When you're little you think that politicians are these grandiose figures...almost like demi-Gods. Imagine if Benjamin Franklin walked into your kitchen to have dinner? You wouldn't even be able to breathe. It would be like having Superman in your kitchen. When I got into high school though, I looked at my state politicians and at a lot of the senators and realized they were no different than the goofy, heavily polarizing losels that ran for student office. People so socially clueless about anything going on that they were more laughable than worth listening to. Anyways, Obama doesn't really fit into that category, I guess.

Consider for a moment, though, that most of our politicians are Christian businessmen or lawyers. To what extent do these issues truly affect us? I wish we had a system that allowed Classicists, Physicists, Biologists, Jews, Atheists, Muslims, Computer engineers, Architects. Why not? I find these marginalized people infinitely more useful than anyone in office. It's too bad Carl Sagan never took office. The world would be Arcadia.
Martin's last part--I agree. It would be tres cool.

Natashya--This is a great post! I read Henry V too, and I really wanted to do something comparing his speeches to FDR's, since I am studying those in another class. It is interesting to me that politicians throughout history seem to use similar tactics when inspiring people the world over. I wonder why some themes and ideas are so stinking universal? I mean, Plato tried to talk to people about the importance of educating children, and yet, we still hear about it in 2011.

Post a new comment

Comments by